PHEV Mazda SUV primed for NZ?
/Powertrain detail revealed about the CX-60 in run-up to full unveiling next month.
Read MorePowertrain detail revealed about the CX-60 in run-up to full unveiling next month.
Read MoreEnergy-recuperating system now on CX-30.
Read MoreMazda has outlined its upcoming sports utility range and lots more.
Read MoreUpdates for popular Mazda CX-5 have rolled out internationally.
Read MoreBEING in the business of making and selling products that create greenhouse gases responsible for global climate change also fuels Mazda’s eco-consciousness.
It all began in 2007 with Sustainable Zoom-Zoom, a multi-solution plan to reduce vehicle emissions; including a key resolution to reduce “well to wheel” CO2 emissions from its vehicles by 50 percent by 2030 and by 90 percent by 2050.
Read MoreTHE latest entrant to the electric car sector is also proposing keeping petrol and diesel vehicles in circulation for decades yet.
Mazda New Zealand’s call is tied to adoption of synthetic fuels that could make internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles just as clean as electrics.
Read MoreThe CX-30 EV at the Shanghai motor show, above, is a derivative of the petrol edition popular with Kiwis (below) that appears to run the same drivetrain as the MX-30 Electric (bottom) about to release in New Zealand.
MAZDA’S electric vehicle family has doubled, but chances of one day seeing the ‘second child’ CX-30 in New Zealand alongside the battery-fed MX-30 about to go on sale here seem slim at best.
The fully mains reliant version of the CX-30 unveiled at the Shanghai motor show yesterday would conceivably attract Kiwi interest, as the petrol versions on sale here are popular sellers.
However, Mazda Japan has made clear the new car – called CX-30 EV - is for China only at this point.
That point is reinforced by it being set to be produced solely by the brand's Changan Mazda joint venture in Nanjing, China, rather than in Japan, the sourcing point for all Mazda NZ’s passenger product.
Despite having very different body styles – the MX-30 being more rakish and noteworthy for having pillar-less freestyle doors, which open outwards from the central B-pillar point – the MX-30 and the CX-30 are closely related.
Both are based on a common architecture, also shared with the Mazda3, and physical dimensions are very close.
The MX-30 formats in two distinct drivetrain provisions – there is one model designed to run with petrol engine-assisted hybrid and another that avails in full electric. Both are destined for New Zealand availability, pricing yet unknown.
The CX-30 EV also appears to share technology with the expressly battery MX-30 Electric.
The MX-30 MX Hybrid, meantime, is powered by a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine paired to Mazda's M Hybrid system, producing maximum outputs of 114kW and 200Nm through a six-speed automatic transmission sending power to the front wheels only.
The addition of the mild-hybrid system means the model's official fuel consumption figure is reduced to a claimed 6.4L/100km on a combined cycle.
The MX-30 Electric looks much the same as the mild hybrid car, save for some subtle electric badging on the exterior and a combined AC/DC charging point where the fuel cap would normally be – on the rear right-hand side of the vehicle.
The electric model is powered by a 107kW/271Nm electric motor on the front axle and boasts a 35.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack mounted beneath the floor. It is thought the CX-30 EV has the same powertrain.
The MX-30 Electric is capable of up to 200km on a single charge according to the World harmonised Light vehicle Testing Procedure (WLTP). The CX-30 EV is thought to have the same range, which is notably lower than some key competitors, like the Hyundai Kona EV, which has 484kms on WLTP.
Styling differences between the CX-30 EV and regular model that Kiwis know are minimal, though the placement of the battery pack under the floor means the electric model rides somewhat higher than its petrol-powered counterpart. It runs on 19-inch wheels and has 'e-SkyActiv' badging.
It is not clear if the CX-30 EV could provision as the MX-30 Electric also ultimately will, with a petrol-fed rotary engine range-extender drivetrain.
NOW there are two – derivatives of Mazda’s top-selling CX-5 sports utility, that is, with a fiery turbocharged 2.5-litre petrol engine.
One outcome of a mild refresh of the model line is that the 170kW and 420Nm SkyActiv-G 2.5T that has previously restricted to the flagship $61,795 Takami is now also under the bonnet of a new introduction to the family.
At $58,995, the SP25T is effectively a Takami that presents with a bit less plush – so, no leather or sunroof - than the top dog and a slightly sportier ambience, the pair being mechanically identical and both delivering a maker-cited 0-100kmh time of 7.7 seconds.
The engine’s outputs are 30kW/168Nm more than the naturally aspirated 2.5-litre petrol engine offered in mid-spec models.
Mazda NZ says a feature of the SP25T trim is a blackout theme – appropriate, the brand feels, in a country where the national sporting colour is black.
The exterior elements include black metallic alloy wheels and piano black exterior mirrors, while the interior gets black deluxe leatherette/suede seat trim along with a black decoration panel. To set off the black, red stitching has been added to seats and steering wheel.
David Hodge, Mazda NZ managing director, believes the SP25T grade will add to the CX-5s’ solid reputation.
“With the blackout features it will appeal to New Zealand motorists who want all the great features of the CX-5 but in a sportier package. It will certainly make a statement on the road.”
Other changes to the CX-5 line up include the addition of privacy glass to GSX models and turbo badging on the SP25T and Takami grades. All models now feature wireless Apple CarPlay as well as Android Auto, though via USB.
One revision that has appeared overseas will not get here until year-end. That’s the adoption, in high-end models, of a 10.5 inch Mazda Connect infotainment display. For the interim, the upgrade cars will maintain the previous line’s 8.0-inch interface.
The enhanced screen has been on US-market CX-5 models since last August and has a faster processor.
DETERMINATION to align the BT-50 more naturally with its passenger models was a reason Mazda NZ gave when successfully winning head office approval to site the one-tonner into a price zone that has proven significantly different to that occupied by its Isuzu doppelganger.
That impetus also explains why the Auckland-centre distributor has bypassed worksite-biased variants in the D-Max family and focused purely on double cab automatics wellsides, in three rear-drives and three four-wheel-drives, formatting in GSX, GTX and Limited.
The BT-50 rear-drives placing respectively at $47,490 GSX, $51,490 and $53,990, with the four-wheel-drive versions adding an additional $7000, leaves them undercutting their Isuzu equivalents, most obviously at flagship level, where the Limited 4x4 sites $14,500 below the top D-Max X-Terrain. The latter has additional body styling enhancements that, when added to the BT-50, do not reduce the gap significantly.
Isuzu Utes New Zealand, which released its range a month before the BT-50 launch yesterday, has been asked to share its thoughts about Mazda NZ’s strategy, but has not responded.
While BT-50’s pricing also leaves it looking good against the category-dominating Ford Ranger and Toyota Hilux, it’s the situation that exists between it and the D-Max that is most likely to create chat as the models are essentially one and the same under different skins.
Identical chassis, drivetrain, closely linked for bulk interior architecture and built in the same factory in Thailand, on a common line. Mazda was able to implement its own exterior styling, so few panels are shared, and had responsibility for the cabin’s look, but the ute is primarily enough of an Isuzu project for Mazda NZ to refer to their brand as being a customer.
David Hodge (pictured), Mazda NZ managing director, said he could not speak to how Isuzu chose to market the D-Max, but confirmed that BT-50 negotiations were conducted solely with Mazda HQ in Hiroshima, took more than a year and were based on persuading that aligning the BT-50 as not only a workhorse but also a lifestyle alternate to the CX-designated sports utilities would bring growth.
The caveat from persuading Japan to give the green light is that the big factor that has driven the ute market, willingness to discount, will be absent from the sales process for this one.
“Traditionally the (ute) segment has been about a high recommended retail and a high discount, and it’s been that way for a very long time,” Hodge says.
“I think most retail buyers have not had to pay the full RRP for a long time and, if they were, they were probably paying too much.
“With passenger cars, certainly Mazda passenger cars, we’ve tried to make our pricing more transparent, and having our retail price close to what the transaction price is. We’ve now followed that example with the BT-50.
“We don’t expect there will be discounts, but we think … we will have no problem selling it to buyers wanting to pay the price we ask. We think it is a fair price and still offers bloody good value for money.”
They’re not outright selling the BT-50 as a car, or even a straight out car alternate, but the intent is to sell it in the same way they would a passenger vehicle.
Says Hodge about the type: “It was once pretty much solely the vehicle for farmers, tradies and those in the construction industry.
“While they are still a very important buying segment … we wanted to create a truck that was equally capable of being a tough workhorse and also doing the business of transporting the family in comfort to outdoor leisure activities.
“A design that shines equally in all situations, all the way from rough off-road settings to passenger car-like comfort for active weekend life-stylers and families.”
Mazda NZ is confident a fresh step of now including the BT-50 in the Mazda Car programme that has previously been for passenger models, will pay dividend. The old model was subject to a less generous process than now. Buyers of the new benefit from the same cover that has been provisioned the make’s cars: So five years, 150,000km factory warranty and a fixed priced servicing programme, also over five years, in which any scheduled workshop time will never cost more than $250.
That servicing cost cap is a big driver for building trust, Hodge says. “Some of these services can be really, really expensive. If a customer feels they are being looked after by a dealership then they are more likely to want to stay with a brand.”
There’s a third identified strength with the latest model: It’s improved safety. Hodge says it is “as safe, if not safer, than any other new car on sale today.”
As much as Mazda NZ anticipates growth, and has established sales targets, it has no intent of making these public. The outgoing BT-50 was generally languishing at fifth on the annual ute sales roster, but with the new model offering so much more, and with the Holden Colorado – which usually held at third place behind Hiliux and Ranger even after its maker announced in February it was departing from the market – now out of the picture, it’s clear every lower-placed performer will see opportunity to move up.
Hodge doesn’t disagree, but he and product and sales planning manasger Tim Nalden say BT-50’s success will not be measured by chasing share; it’s more about customer satisfaction.
“We’ll just accept where the market puts us,” says Hodge. “WE have a really successful passenger range, so we’re not heavily reliant on the BT-50. It sits alongside our passenger range as an extra vehicle, so we have a complete range. It’s not our do-or-die model.
“We’re pretty confident we are going to do alright with our truck, but the volume is what the volume will be. We will have limited amounts that we can get from the factory. It’s not a tap we can turn on quickly. We can increase volume, but it will take a while.”
In respect to this, Mazda NZ has still not had clarity from Japan about the plant’s operational status, which has been in question since Isuzu announced that production has curtailed, and might not restart until February, due to a Germany-based supplier of a vital part having been closed by Covid-19. Isuzu has intimated the vehicle cannot be built without a component only that supplier can provide. So it has closed the factory.
Well, apparently. Hodge says as far as Mazda NZ is concerned, the BT-50 is still in production until it is emphatically advised otherwise.
“I cannot talk for Isuzu but everything we have been told is that our December production is firm. We have not heard anything about our January production but we will assume, until we hear otherwise, that this is also unaffected.”
TWINS under the skin – but the Mazda BT-50 and Isuzu D-Max have proven somewhat less closely related when it comes to price, particularly at sales hot zone flagship level, where a $14,500 difference exists.
Focused purely on double cab automatics wellsides, Mazda’s mix comprises three rear-drives and three four-wheel-drives, formatting in GSX, GTX and Limited, the rear-drives respectively at $47,490 GSX, $51,490 and $53,990 and the four-wheel-drive versions adding an additional $7000.
So, three trim levels versus Isuzu’s four, no single or space cabs as in the partner’s mix and, so, fewer choices.
The line isn’t adverse to work, yet aims at a lifestyle-valuing customer chasing a reasonable passenger experience. It’s all about lifestyle balance, suggests product spokesman Tim Nalden.
“It’s rugged, it gets the job done … but it also offers new versatility outside of nine to five.”
On current trend, pure toilers aren’t requisite for volume expansion. Diesel utes achieve one in four new vehicle sales nationally, double cabs snare 94 percent of that volume and, within that, automatic uptake is high (86 percent). Three in every five utes sold in NZ are diesel, double cab and four-wheel-drive. So, what Mazda has now tailors very well to consumer taste.
And that’s where it gets interesting. Like its sister ship, BT-50 installs a remarkably high tech loading, particularly in respect to safety and driver assist. Like Isuzu, Mazda has felt need to raise its prices to account for this, yet at showroom level, the outcomes are quite different.
All weighing in Mazda’s favour? In scenarios of best specification equivalency with Isuzu’s models, the Mazdas seem to have price advantage.
That is most apparent when flagships are compared. Whereas Isuzu asks $75,490 for the high-tech and glam D-Max X-Terrain, Mazda NZ’s equivalent, the Limited, is a $60,990 vehicle.
The top choice models’ specifications are not identical; X-Terrain standardises with roof rails, fender flares, a rollout tonneau cover, rub liner and aero sports bar Mazda buyers will have to pluck from the accessories catalogue. Even after doing so, the BT-50 buyer is likely spending comfortably less.
The BT-50 enjoys keyless entry and start, a feature only on X-Terrain, in mid as well as high-grade trim; both flagships have part-leather seats but Mazda adds seat heating; the BT-50 is sold with a spare alloy wheel, where the D-Max ships with a steel spare and Mazda is confident it has an appealing warranty and servicing package, both five years and up to 150,000km (any service capped at $250), and five years roadside assist.
On top of that, both stand equally tall due to their maker (Isuzu) having gone to town on active and passive safety equipment in an attempt to establish technology and safety benchmarks.
Buy into either range and regardless of the variant you get eight airbags (including a segment-first “far side” restraint to separate driver and front passenger in a side collision), autonomous emergency braking, stop/go adaptive cruise, blind spot detection, lane departure warning/assist, forward collision avoidance, drive attention warning, automatic high-beam lights, rain-sensing wipers and a reversing camera.
The D-Max and BT-50 are the only two utes tested under the very latest ANCAP protocols; both achieved the maximum five score and, though other rivals have this too, their returns were achieved when the test was less stringent. The Isuzu just beat the Mazda on the Vulnerable Road User score (69 per cent versus 67), so it’s officially the safest one-tonne ute on the market right now.
Mazda’s pricing strategy is also bullish when compared for those for the Toyota Hilux and Ford Ranger, which are the dominant two choices with ute buyers, again resonating in the same formats Mazda brings, as well as the Mitsubishi Triton.
When comparison restricts to the top spec offers, the Limited undercuts the Ranger Wildtrak – and incoming $69,990 FX4 - but places $2000 above Hilux SR5 Cruiser, though Mazda’s spec is stronger, closer overall to Ford’s highest trim provisions and, in some instances, exceeding them.
However, the situation that exists with the BT-50 and D-Max is arguably most interesting, given that they are essentially one and the same under different skins. Identical chassis, drivetrain, closely linked for bulk interior architecture and are built in the same factory line, on a common line (which has closed until February due to Covid concerns).
It is not clear if suspension tuning is different between brands, but both offer same base level of performance of 140kW/450Nm from the 3.0-litre turbo-diesel four-cylinder engine. Quoted fuel consumption is the same for both, with an 8.0L/100km combined claim for the shared auto transmissions; so, around 20 percent more efficient than the preceding BT-50’s five-cylinder.
Both utes have a maximum braked towing capacity of 3500kg – pretty standard for a 4x4 double-cab ute – and both have payloads of 1050 to 1080kg.
Off-road wise, they share approach, departure and ramp-over angles of 30.5, 24.2 and 23.8 degrees, respectively and each is able to wade in depths up to 800mm.
Look inside either and the cabins are very well equipped. Each receives a 9.0-inch infotainment screen which runs wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto on top-spec models. A smaller digital read-out within the instrument cluster to provide key vehicle information. Entry-level variants in each range equip a 7.0-inch infotainment screen.
Dual-zone climate control, rear air vents, leather-appointed seats and keyless entry are other hallmarks in the higher-end models.
Fair to summarise that both new models are far advanced than their predecessors; all those extras unavoidably have to add to the bottom line. The old D-Max at full retail was positioned between $39,890 and $61,990, but an aggressive clearance over the last few months has delivered those editions for substantially reduced stickers. The previous BT-50, which will continue in some forms for months yet, was generally around $8000 less now.
The utes share few exterior panels because Mazda’s styling team has again worked to engender a tie to its car line; much more successfully than with the previous generation, which suffered from over-ambitious creativity and poor timing.
Within 18 months of the last ute coming out, Mazda adopted a new styling ethos called Kodo which it still adheres to 10 years on. The old ute was right out of step; the new one not at all.
MAZDA BT-50 is about to release here, following in tyre tracks of its Isuzu D-Max sister ship, which launched here in October.
DISTRIBUTORS for the Isuzu D-Max and its Mazda BT-50 sister ship are confident they have enough stock here and en route to establish the utes in the market while the factory in Thailand making both is closed, potentially for at least three months.
However, the national sales operations for each brand have stopped short of commenting about the potential of supply of the technically-aligned models yet being affected at some juncture.
All that is known for sure about the shutdown is that it has been caused by a third-party supplier being unable to get a vital component to Isuzu, which makes both vehicles, and that this will likely keep the plant closed until February, though that timeline is tentative.
Mazda New Zealand was today awaiting further information from head office in Japan.
At the moment, it has not been advised about whether the BT-50 is even directly impacted. It is on standby for any updates and says, for now, it’s business as usual.
Meantime, Isuzu Utes New Zealand has offered the following: “ Our understanding is there is a reduction in production due to the delay in component supply from Europe, and are therefore working with (the) factory to manage our future supply chain.”
News of the situation comes as Mazda NZ is in the process of launching the BT-50 to dealers, with intent to publicly announce pricing and specifications when showing it to media on November 24.
A Mazda NZ spokesman expressed confidence today that even if there was to be an impact on New Zealand, it would not be felt immediately – or perhaps at all.
There is a big stockpile of vehicles in this country already because the model is of high priority “and we have forward ordered supply numbers accordingly.”
Isuzu Utes New Zealand, which released the D-Max in October, offered much the same thought.
“We have sufficient stock here in NZ with further arriving later this month, December and January,” said communications manager Kimberley Waters.
Isuzu Japan acknowledged the situation yesterday, saying had to ‘suspend’ assembly. Subsequent media reports say it stems back to a parts supplier in Europe being shut down due to Covid-19. Some outlets are suggesting the crucial item is an engine component from Germany.
The two utes were co-developed by Mazda and Isuzu and, though stylings and equipment levels appear to differ, they are identical in mechanical make-up; same 3.0-litre turbodiesel engine, same transmissions and a common platform.
Yet that doesn’t automatically mean Mazda is in the same pickle. Parts for the jointly-developed vehicles are sourced globally, so at this stage only the D-Max is absolutely known to be affected.
The D-Max line selected for New Zealand appears identical to that going to Australia, where Isuzu’s distributor has expectation of fall-out.
It has sent out statement regretting the vehicle’s production has been “temporarily put on hold” and explaining that this “unfortunate pause in vehicle production is related to one of our key component suppliers in Europe (producing unique components for our Australian-specification D-Max) has had to temporally close their manufacturing plant due to COVID-19.
“As a result we have had to suspend our D-MAX production in Thailand for up to three months, with a tentative recommencement of vehicle production of February 2021."
The models’ arrival and market impact in New Zealand is a big news story as the latest generation has been the first one-tonne utility to be accredited with a top-drawer five star safety score under a toughened test regime that independent scorer and national crash test agency, the Australasian New Car Assessment Programme, implemented in January. Other competitor utes with five star scores from ANCAP received these when the test was easier.
DIFFERENT badges, same basic engineering, technology and design – and it’s paid off for Mazda’s twin to the Isuzu D-Max in crash testing.
A month after determining Isuzu’s soon-to-release new one tonne ute was worthy of a maximum five star score from a crash test that became tougher this year, the national crash testing agency has decided the BT-50 that is a co-development of that model should achieve the same score.
Surprised? Well, there’s potential you might be because, even though the sister utes are both on the top rung, it’s questionable the Mazda can claim utter category-first equality.
Mazda’s ute scores just slightly lower for impacts regarding pedestrians and cyclists in the vulnerable road user criteria due to the different nose design.
That in itself might seem an interesting outcome as, when it came to assessing the Mazda, the New Zealand Government-funded and NZ Automobile Association-supported Australasian New Car Assessment Programme didn’t put one into the wall, as occurred with the D-Max.
Rather, the outcomes determined for the Mazda accrue from the agency extrapolating results from the D-Max test and also giving consideration to technical data provided by Mazda.
All this means the BT-50 carries the exact same ratings for adult occupant protection (83 percent), child occupant protection (89 percent), and safety assist (81 percent).
The safety system on the Mazda, like the Isuzu, consists of a comprehensive suite of tech such as AEB, adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning with steering assist, blind spot monitoring and advanced speed assist, and many others.
ANCAP’s rating applies for all BT-50 models.
Isuzu will have a head start on leveraging the score, with the D-Max expected to be on sale within the fortnight; timing which gives it around four week’s head start over the Mazda, this to honour an international agreement between the makes that gives Isuzu first dibs on strength that the ute is their basic design and comes from their factory.
OLD will remain selling beside new when Mazda here releases the latest BT-50.
Talk of at least some variants from the present model family remaining on sale for months beyond the new rig’s arrival has been tacitly confirmed by the national distributor.
While Mazda New Zealand isn’t keen to discuss specifics of how and when everything will unfold, it has confirmed the two generations will sit together and also not denied this is planned to occur from November until next March.
Conceivably, it’s a strategy that seems to be mainly to answer demand for models other than those in a dual cab configuration, which is the only format the new vehicle will initially provision in.
Thought that the distributor might also be undertaking a plan to lessen the sticker shock that has come with the new model’s sister ship, the Isuzu D-Max, seems less likely now that BT-50 pricing for Australia has been released.
Assuming – and it’s sometimes not a good idea to – that our neighbour’s positioning has some relevance to what will happen here, then the Mazda would seem to be in stronger position than the Isuzu models.
On today’s exchange rate, the 11-strong BT-50 line starts at the equivalent of $NZ47,694, for a dual cab chassis four by two in XT automatic form, and tops at $64,889 as a dual cab pick up four-wheel-drive auto GT.
The Isuzu line runs from $49,990 to $75,490 here.
Mazda NZ product and sales planning manager Tim Nalden has indicated that NZ market pricing is still being sorted.
“We’re still obviously working through that as it’s coming out toward the end of the year.”
He did not want to go into the details of the product strategy, beyond acknowledging the current and incoming vehicles will be together for a while.
“We just think there’s potential for the current model.”
What helps Mazda NZ with this is that the new BT-50 and the existing vehicle come from different plants in Thailand.
The one incoming built in Isuzu’s plant in Thailand, off a line that has been dedicated to making the Holden Colorado and the previous D-Max.
The present BT-50, of course, was developed with Ford, and comes from the AutoAlliance factory which will continue to make the Ranger for the next year.
One potential selling point for the D-Max is the impressive score it achieved in crash testing by an independent assessor recognised and funded by our Government and the New Zealand Automobile Association.
Ironically, that five star accreditation meted the D-Max after it flew through a tougher test than older utes faced to achieve their equivalent scores won’t be of use to Mazda.
Although the BT-50 and D-Max and identical in technical make up and are sure to be closely related in their engineering, it is understood by Nalden that the Mazda will have to undergo an entirely separate crash test so as to achieve a wholly bespoke rating.
david Hodge: Mazda is in good shape to weather tough conditions.
NEW passenger and commercial vehicle sales in 2020 will likely be down 20 percent over last year, a drop of almost 31,000 registrations.
This assessment is from Mazda New Zealand’s boss, who holds that crunch time is coming.
If David Hodge’s prediction for this degree of calendar year-on-year decline is realised, it will represent the biggest drop since 2009, when new car sales plummeted 28 percent as the local economy tanked amid the global financial crisis.
Last year’s accrual of 154,479 new passenger and light commercial vehicles was already a decline, being 4.3 percent off the 2018 tally.
Regardless that the last three months has seemed rosy for registrations, the market year to date was down 24 percent at the end of August, Hodge notes.
It will remain tough though he also contends his own brand is in good shape, all things considered, to weather what’s ahead.
For one, he says, his make has steered clear of an emerging national stock shortage scenario of concern to the distributors’ representative body, the Motor Industry Association.
In respect to the surge in registrations over the past three months that has hastened the depletion of the national new vehicle stock pile to apparent verge of exhaustion, Hodge reminds that some of this is down to orders from April and May – when the industry was frozen by the national lockdown - coming to fruition.
The BT-50 is Mazda’s next new model here and is considered a crucial vehicle.
He respects the MIA’s reasons for offering a view about the increasingly parlous state of stock availability, and doesn’t absolutely question the accuracy of figures being bandied, but says it isn’t representative of his own brand’s status.
According to the association, new vehicle distributors normally carry up to 100 days’ stock for vehicles and large parts, but this has reduced by around 50 percent, to just over 11,000 units – the lowest in at least eight years and half the tally held in April. The situation for commercial models is said to be worse, that stockpile have quartered to under 5000 vehicles by the end of last month.
“Maybe 100 days is right as an industry average, but it’s not our situation. We have a shorter pipeline (for stock) against, for instance, the European brands.
“We are comfortable with our stock levels. We are lean, yes, but our stock pipeline is full, absolutely chocka.
“We have no problem at all with the number of vehicles coming to us.”
He wondered if Mazda had advantage over many other makes, or at least those unable to source from Japan, where production was virtually back to normal, or as close as it could be with working conditions being adjusted for coronavirus safety measures.
Mazda NZ takes cars from two plants in Japan and the BT-50 is from Thailand.
“Our plants are as close to 100 percent as is possible. The Japanese plants lost a shift the other day because of a typhoon, but other than that they are at full shifts.”
Hodge says Mazda production been relatively unaffected by coronavirus so the supply pipeline is full.
The commercial sector is now of high interest to Mazda NZ, as it plans a November release for the new-generation BT-50, by and large a doppelganger for the Isuzu D-Max that goes on sale on October.
That model comes from the Isuzu plant in Thailand where, Hodge says, the impact of Covid-19 has not been huge. Also, the local workforce was in good readiness.
“They are accustomed to wearing masks, so that wasn’t unnatural for them, and they (Thai people) are not hand-shakers, so there’s another factor that probably makes them safer.
“I think the Thai plant did shut down for a while but that was demand-driven, not health-driven.”
Hodge says the country going into lockdown in April was a stress for the motor industry and enforced that the car business at distributor level was essentially a “big money go round, money in, money out.
The ‘money’ in suddenly curtailed “and it was a hard stop. But the money out kept happening as we still had a pipeline of cars and a commitment to the plant for vehicles we ordered and had to pay for.
“It was an issue of liquidity and we worked hard with local banks here. We had strong backing relationships and that’s what saw us through that initial shock.”
After that, it was a waiting game. “We carried on work from home and though we didn’t sell anything we had a launch (the CX-30) at that time.” It also maintained a parts supply, initially to emergency services but gradually to the general public as shutdown conditions eased.
“Once we got out of Level Three, then to Level Two it was rally business as usual and when we got to One it was ‘yay, everything is back to the way it was.’
“But during April and mos of May the industry basically stopped. It didn’t go in a decline or anything, it was a hard stop. Same for the entire economy.”
The tourism, aviation and hospitality sectors had a “bloody good stomp” and were still quite sore, still, he suggested, “but the rst of the economy basically has largely carried on.”
The apparent rush in new vehicle sales in June, July and August was more perceived that actual, he suggested. The April and May activity also had influence.
“A lot of the sales in June, July and August were people who were going to buy in April and May. That has just helped top up those months.”
A small displacement Roots-type supercharger assists with the high volume of air needed for ultra-lean combustion.
‘CROSSOVER’ has become a modern automotive buzzword.
Mazda has developed a crossover engine – one which runs on petrol but has combustion characteristics more closely aligned to diesel.
And to emphasise the achievement it’s applied the X-suffix to its SkyActiv nomenclature.
The new 2.0-litre SkyActiv-X delivers the throttle response and revving characteristics of a petrol engine with the high torque and low consumption attributes of a diesel.
It’s a practical application of the Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) petrol engine principle in which a very lean air:fuel mixture reacts spontaneously to heat and pressure during the compression stroke.
To-date HCCI has been considered impractical for production vehicles because they work in a narrow range of conditions. Variations in atmospheric pressure, temperature and fuel quality can result in destructive pre-ignition and detonation.
Mazda’s clever solution has been to add spark control to an engine that theoretically shouldn’t require a spark plug along with a world-first application of in-cylinder pressure sensors.
The SkyActiv-X engine achieves both spark ignition and compression ignition and can move between modes.
Mazda calls the technology SPark Controlled Compression Ignition (SPCCI). The new engine has a very high 16.3:1 static compression ratio and operates at extremely lean air:fuel mixtures.
The theoretical ideal for gasoline engines is to burn a 14.7:1 air:fuel ratio - known as stoichiometric - which defines that all fuel is burnt without excess air.
SkyActiv-X can operate at ratios more than twice as lean (higher than 30:1) – a scenario in which a spark plug would be unable to ignite the lean mixture.
SkyActiv engine production is now at full steam
In SkyActiv-X the spark plug is used to initiate and control combustion. As the piston is compressing the ultra-lean mixture the engine control systems are monitoring cylinder pressure and combustion is initiated with a small and precisely timed atomised fuel charge being injected close to the spark plug.
When ignited it creates an expanding fireball (Mazda calls this an air piston) that rapidly raises the pressure and temperature in the combustion chamber to the point where the much leaner mixture is ignited.
Mazda says size and timing of the fireball is being constantly altered. At cold start and under high revs/high load conditions the engine primarily works in spark ignition mode.
Across a range of normal driving conditions, it is estimated the engine operates in SPCCI mode about 90 per cent of time.
The extremely lean mixture burns cooler which in turn reduces temperature differences in the cylinder head, piston and cylinder walls. The cooler combustion also significantly reduces the formation of nitrogen oxides (NOx).
Along with less fuel the engine also requires more air for which the solution is a small displacement, belt-driven ‘‘Roots’’ type supercharger.
Mazda's MZ-D Connect centre display provides confirmation of when the SkyActiv-X engine is running in SPCCI mode.
In common with the familiar SkyActiv-G 2.0-litre direct injection petrol unit, the SkyActiv-X measures 1998cc displacement. The engines share much of their block and bore/stroke architecture but a new cylinder head has been designed for SkyActiv-X.
Peak power is 132kW at 6000rpm (compared to the current 2.0-litre SkyActiv-G developing 114kW) along with 224Nm of torque at 3000rpm (up from 200Nm and arriving 1000rpm earlier than current SkyActiv-G engines).
When its powering a six-speed auto Mazda3 hatch on 18-inch alloy wheels the fuel consumption is rated at 5.8L/100km (WLTP test procedure) and Mazda estimates an overall consumption improvement in the region of 15 to 17 per cent along with corresponding CO2 emission improvements.
There’s also a Mild Hybrid contribution to the SkyActiv-X efficiency equation with a belt-driven 24-volt integrated starter/generator system. It assists with engine starting, initial movement away from stationary and bolsters the lower portion of the torque curve.
Hybrid output is rated at 4.8kW of power at 1000rpm with a 60.5Nm torque boost at just 200rpm.
To support the new engine characteristics the gear ratios have been altered. The SPCCI engine doesn’t conform to a normal pattern of increased fuel usage as engine revs increase so shorter gear ratios allow the engine to rev a little higher and provide improved response and a sportier character.
While Mazda has achieved a petrol engine breakthrough with its SkyActiv-X technology, the company says diesel engine vehicles will continue and there is a second generation SkyActiv-D diesel family expected to be announced in the near future.
the Mazda3 (above) and CX-30 are first candidates for this new engine technology.
Mazda is now hinting the SkyActiv-X tech won’t restrict to the 2.0-litre engine likely to provision to NZ drivers soon.
“IT is a combustion technology – and that combustion can work on any size of engine, so it doesn’t need to be a 2.0-litre; it can be in other things…”
As New Zealand ramps up to receive our first Mazda vehicles with the brand’s SkyActiv-X engine technology, this comment from the marque’s marketing director in Australia is a good reminder about the full potential of the world’s first production-ready petrol that uses compression ignition.
For now, two models off a common platform have adopted what Hiroshima formally calls it’s SPCCI – for spark plug controlled compression ignition – tech: The Mazda3 and the CX-30 crossover.
Those cars run together in every market where SkyActiv-X places; including in Australia, though there the introductions are staged. The road car first, from this month, and the CX-30 following in September.
Will that double act also provision in New Zealand? All odds favour that outcome, but the local distributor isn’t yet ready to make an announcement. Media have been notified of a conference dedicated to SkyActiv discussion will occur in four weeks’ time.
Anyway, when Mazda Australia staged its press introduction to the cars last week, marketing head Alistair Doak made a good point by reminding that simply because SPCCI – and the mild hybrid involvement it also delivers (more on this in a bit) dubbed Mazda M Hybrid - only packages for now in a 2.0-litre four cylinder form doesn’t mean it cannot reach into other displacements or cylinder counts in the future.
compact crossovers and SUVs are on a sales roll, so a SkyActiv-X provision in the well-received CX-30 is a logical enhancement.
Doak provided the comment that introduces this story as a response to being asked whether the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder could power a vehicle as large as the Mazda CX-9, as an example.
He went on to suggest hinted that Mazda might choose to upscale SkyActiv-X to an engine of larger displacement. But equally true, he suggested, there was no reason the maker couldn’t develop a smaller engine employing the same process.
Which means? Sorry, Doak – doubtless because he is a former motoring writer – was too canny to fall into letting out any secrets in respect to future rollouts.
However, he hinted that the option likely won’t remain the preserve of flagship models in the Mazda3 and CX-30 ranges for long.
Currently, he said, there were no plans to expand SkyActiv-X in other models, “but it’s certainly available to us in Mazda3 and CX-30. It’s available in Europe in those models, across all grades… or most grades…
“So there is that availability… should the desire from customers be there. But ultimately, it’s up to us, from a marketing and brand point of view to tell the story, and explain what SkyActiv is,” he explained.
“If people like that story, and are curious, then hopefully they’ll come and test-drive, and hopefully they’ll buy.
“If the demand is there, then absolutely, we’ll meet that demand. But we haven’t started yet, so it’s very much a hypothetical at this point.”
SkyActiv-X is certainly a new chapter, in that it marks the start of Mazda’s corporate goal to reduce ‘well-to-wheel’ emissions by 50 percent from 2010 to 2030.
It has been in production since last August, and was first revealed to the world in 2018, so you might wonder why it has taken so long to get here.
reduced emissions are a strong plus point with SPCCI.
Coronavirus likely hasn’t been much help but even before that global calamity Mazda had determined to focus first on servicing western Europe, for simple reason that countries there encourage low CO2 engines. The Mazda3 hits that button, if not quite as effectively as a hybrid, with a claimed emission of 127 grams per kilometre.
Sure enough, the make has seen a brisk take-up of the technology in those initial target markets, to the point where the acceptance rate has been much higher than it anticipated.
"Since we launched the engine, we are seeing a very encouraging feedback: 60 percent of the orders for the Mazda3 are currently for cars equipped with the Skyactiv-X engine, as well as 45 percent of orders for the Mazda CX-30 crossover," Mazda Europe CEO Yasuhiro Aoyama said last August. That rate has not decreased since then and the demand has stretched Mazda’s capabilities.
Still, it seems to have now found ability to service our part of the world. Our neighbour reckons it can achieve good supply of the Mazda3, which it takes in manual and automatic formats, and the CX-30, which it will achieve purely in auto. NZ might be even more selective and take just the auto.
SPCCI’s potential to deliver will be eagerly monitored. For one, everyone will be keen to establish the value aspect; a focus that becomes important because this is a premium priced engine, more expensive than the ‘regular’ four cylinders that provision in the two models in 2.0-litre and 2.5-litre formats.
In our neighbour’s case the SkyActiv-X models cost $NZ3300 more than the priciest 2.5s. It’s expected Mazda NZ will do as other markets have and package the powertrain into its plushest trim level, which in this market is called Takami. That’ll be a new fit out for the CX-30, where the current trim line tops with a Limited provision.
As said, SkyActiv-X uses compression ignition typical of a diesel, but with a petrol engine which the brand says helps blend the high-revving character of a petrol engine with the fuel efficiency and torque of an oiler.
Capable of both spark ignition and compression ignition, the engine can utilise the two types of combustion while operating in tandem.
To further maximise fuel efficiency, the engine features an integrated, belt-driven starter generator and 24-volt lithium-ion battery which assists the engine and recoups lost energy during deceleration.
The addition qualifies this to be considered the first hybrid offering in Mazda’s local line-up. Next year, of course, it seems set to deliver its first electric car, with the MX-30.
As explained in previous stories, the attraction of SkyActiv-X is that it presents an intriguing ‘cake and eat it’ proposal – decent pep and yet also potential to deliver very good parsimony.
European numbers show the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine will generate 132kW and 224Nm of torque, while fuel economy of 4.3 litres per 100km from the manual is getting close to Toyota Prius levels of efficiency. Be aware that this figure is the result of Mazda using the NEDC testing regime, a format that has now been largely shelved on grounds it’s results are difficult to achieve in everyday driving. Using the now preferred 'real world' (WLTP) fuel economy formula, the claimed consumption is 5.4L/100km.
Still, that thrift and the power outputs place it above the existing 114kW/200Nm 2.0-litre unit and, while the 2.5-litre engine has more punch, with 139kW/252Nm, it also achieves it by using more fuel, 6.6 litres per 100km in an automatic Mazda3 on the test cycle.
BOUGHT a Ford Ranger or Toyota Hilux in the past few years purely on strength of these being considered well-kitted for driver assists and safety equipment?
If so, then perhaps the replacements for those models should be two rigs that until now have been overshadowed on those ingredients.
Impression that this model and the Mazda BT-50 that derives from it are set to deliver enough advanced safety and technology to reset market expectations has been cemented by how the D-Max has just presented in Australia.
While Isuzu and Mazda in New Zealand have yet to set release dates for the new-gen one-tonners in this market – beyond saying it’ll be before year-end - and even though the BT-50 has also yet to touch down in Australia, the D-Max’s specification for Australia, its first export market, have been fully laid out.
That act - which includes the video here today, made because the Australian media were introduced by way of a virtual launch, because of coronavirus - lends accurate insight in what’s coming here, given that the NZ market representatives of both makes have never made any secret that we can expect basically identical provisions that are being delivered across the Tasman.
If so, then ute market leader, Ford, and consistent runner-up Toyota are going have to become used to now treating the Isuzu and Mazda products more seriously as direct equals than they might have done previously.
Isuzu essentially shocked the Australian industry in announcing every single model in the 2021 D-max range – including the basic tradie versions – will come with an advanced safety package, including class-first advances of perimeter sensing technology and a centre airbag.
It’s highly likely everything that goes into the Isuzu will transfer to the Mazda, given those model lines are already so closely aligned in every other major mechanical and design aspect.
As is, all D-Max models announced for our neighbour – and that’s four variants, from base SX to a new flagship X-Terrain fitted with plenty of flash kit - come with the new Intelligent Driver Assistance System (IDAS) with a unique twin-camera system used by independent partner Hitachi. Enabling 3D effect, the cameras substitute the usual radar sensors which mount lower in the vehicle and can be easily fouled by mud, dirt and accessories.
Yes, it might well come at a cost. The new flagship D-Max X-Terrain Crew Cab is $A58,990 ($64,648 in our money), so some $A7000 ($7676) more than its current range-topping D-Max LS-T.
However, this provision also means that what has until now been a stalwart work ute has become an especially advanced offering.
The full capabilities of the safety system include Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), AEB with turn assist, forward collision warning, post-collision warning, mis-acceleration mitigation and adaptive cruise control (but only on automatics), lane departure warning and prevention, lane keep assist (also not for manual), traffic sign recognition, speed limited, blind-spot monitoring, auto high beams, rear cross-traffic alert and driver attention assist.
This big step up in safety tech is supported by the ute having also gone new in its design: A new look, fresh – though still, of course, old-school ladder frame - chassis and an all-new engine and improved drivetrain are also likely to be appreciated.
Three D-Max cabin types are offered to our neighbour - Single Cab, Space Cab and Crew Cab – and aside from X-Terrain there are SX, LS-M and LS-U variants.
D-Max’s renowned robustness is still a core ingredient, Isuzu assure; it says the development programme included more than four million kilometres of “vigorous” testing to ensure it has improved in every area of ride and handling and performance yet retained that acknowledged toughness.
Though it maintains the 3.0-litre capacity associated with the current D-Max, the ‘4JJ3-TCX’ turbo diesel engine is new. It produces 140kW at 3600rpm 450Nm of torque at 1600-2600rpm, an increase of 10kW and 30Nm over the old motor.
Isuzu speaks to a quieter, more refined performance with noticeable real-world driveability improvements. Just as importantly, in the legislative world, it now complies with Euro 5 emissions regs. Be prepared for a slight change of pace in respect to fuel burn. In some variants it sits at 7.7 litres per 100km
But others are up to 8.1L.
Transmission choices are a six-speed manual or auto, the latter being a new Aisin Rev-Tronic unit with sports mode and manual shifting.
A body that has grown wider (with a 30mm longer wheelbase) provides more cabin space, yet the shape is more aerodynamically efficient. The interior fitout has been covered previously, but one turnup is that the multimedia system (seven-inch screen at base, nine-inch for the luxury provision) is capable of wireless Apple CarPlay connectivity – a first for a ute in this market. Android users need a USB cable to use the Auto service.
The larger touchscreen has built-in sat nav and interior appointments have also been given the upmarket treatment with new finishes and soft-touch surfaces.
The flagship has electrically operated leather-accented seats, piano black trim, remote engine start, dark grey alloy wheels, aero sports bar, roller tonneau cover and tub liner.
Ride and handling have improved, with new independent double-wishbone front and the same three-leaf spring setup in the rear but with 30mm of axle travel and tuned to light or heavy load work depending on the grade of model.
It also delivers upgrade to off-road ability, with all 4×4 models now offering an electromechanical rear differential lock, improved ‘Terrain Command’ that can shift from low to high range within one second on the move at up to 100kmh.
The D-Max has an 800mm wading depth. Aussie’s LS-U and X-Terrain also have a higher 240mm ground clearance with 30.5 degrees approach, 24.2 degrees departure and 22.8 degrees ramp-over. All four-by-two and four-by-four also offer hill start assist and hill descent control as standard.
For touring and working, the payload goes up to 1320kg in the SX cab chassis, and towing capacity is 3500kg braked with a 350kg tow ball limit. GCM is 5950kg and GVM goes up to 3100kg.
Oh yeah, we need to talk about the accessories – no ute being complete without a few add-ons, right?
The Aus market is taking more than 50 accessories - bullbars, tow bars, electronic brake systems, roof racks, cargo organisers, alloy trays and tonneau covers, as well as toolboxes and oddments.
Take note that the Isuzu factory nudge or alloy/steel bullbars will work with the IDAS system.
Towers will be able to select a tow pack with tow ball kit rated to 350kg and meeting expectations of the 3500kg braked towing capacity, and a Redarc electric braking system. There’s also a weight-distribution hitch on the list.
And what will all that tech do for the crash test rating? Conceivably, it should go well. Isuzu itself is said to be highly confident D-Max will score a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating. However, that’s yet to be proven. crash testing has been delayed due to the coronavirus pandemic.
RIGHT out of left field … and, unfortunately, at this stage only likely to be built in left-hand drive.
That’s the news about the much-anticipated Mazda3 Turbo, whose existence was finally properly confirmed today in an announcement that also makes clear just Canada, Mexico and the United States are the only cited markets.
Mazda New Zealand has reinforced this, saying prior to the unveiling (but subsequent to an early sneak peak out of Mexico): “With regards to the Mazda3 Turbo, we currently do not have any information on availability of this vehicle for right-hand drive markets.” Asked, in wake of today’s announcement, if it had anything fresh to say, it said it had not.
What makes that news all the harder to take is that the first Mazda3 hot hatch – and sedan (cos it’s coming in both shapes) – since the MPS seems perfectly baked.
In addition to releasing the two images here, Mazda USA has also provisioned enough technical info about a product they’ll have on the street within a few months to make it patently obvious it’s even more pumped than was first conjectured.
Though intrinsically the same unit running in the CX-5, CX-9 and Mazda6, the model’s 2.5-litre turbo four-cylinder petrol engine has been retuned to produce 186kW and 434Nm. As against 140kW/252Nm in the CX-5 and 170kW/420Nm in the larger models.
Regardless of all the extra mumbo, those outputs relate unevenly against obvious rivals already working the scene here – basically, less power than a lot but generally more torque.
The Hyundai i30 N makes 202kW/378Nm, the newly-arrived Ford Focus ST has 207kw/420Nm, the Honda Civic Type-R cracks out 228kW/400Nm and VW’s Golf GTI and Golf R respectively deliver 180kW/370Nm and 213kW/380Nm.
The Mazda is four-wheel-drive and, interestingly, will avail purely with a version of the six-speed automatic that’s staple fare in Mazda product here.
The images don’t give too much away about the appearance pack, but enough is shown to suggest it’s quite subdued, save for the addition of some additional black exterior elements, such as a front splitter and rear spoiler.
LOCAL market allocation of special editions Mazda has created to celebrate a brand milestone is being decided by novel means.
Customers have the final say about models dress in celebration of the Hiroshima brand hitting a century of existence, since 1960 as an automobile manufacturer.
Auckland-domiciled Mazda New Zealand has explained this in wake of an earlier announcement about the consignment size.
The only constraint from Japan is that it can take no more than 100 100th Anniversary Editions and that the trim can apply to the nine passenger models it produces – so, if you want a special BT-50 one-tonne ute, bad luck.
Beyond that, it’s open slather of what provisions nationally in a colour scheme and with equipment that pays homage to Mazda’s first passenger vehicle, the 1960 R360 coupe.
A process that explains why these are being called ‘special’ rather than ‘limited’ editions is also influenced by the production cycle. Mazda being among makers that simply hasn’t capacity to send all the kinds of cars it creates down the line in any one day, so the order deadlines - in August, October and November - are by car line. It’s also why delivery will span the next five months.
However, the national customer response already has been so strong already that it is conceivable the whole process could be wrapped up before the mid-August deadline for the first tranche, brand spokespeople say.
“We’re limited to 100 units all up,” explained marketing services manager Maria Tsao. “But we haven’t been restricted on which models.”
The Anniversary-trimmed Mazda2, Mazda3, Mazda6, CX-3, CX-30, CX-5, CX-8, CX-9 and MX-5 each carry a $1500 premium over their respective donor variants – which are existing Takami editions except where that trim doesn’t avail (so, for Mazda2 and MX-5, Limiteds appear to be the start point).
Anniversary Editions are Snowflake White Pearl on the outside with special badging and wheel caps, burgundy leather seat trim with headrest logo, red floor carpet and floor mats aluminium branding, Anniversary key fob, special edition lower instrument panel trim and white door trim inserts.
The order book for MX-5s and Mazda6s closes first, in mid-August. CX-5 and CX-8 decisions have to be made by mid-September. Interest in the remaining candidate cars has to be sorted by mid-October. The last cars will be here by January; the first are expected within two months.
It’s not as confusing as it might sound, Tsao and product and sales planning manager Tim Nalden assure. The beauty is that customers get a level of involvement makers generally don’t allow. As Nalden puts it – this is less about provisioning 100 cars than satisfying 100 customers.
Mazda NZ has declined to detail what’s hitting the right buttons but says suggestion some cars – the MX-5 being the obvious primary choice - might lend themselves more to favouritism hasn’t really played out so far.
Yes, there’s been elevated interest in the global category best-seller that holds the best residuals of all current models and achieves 4-5 sales a month, yet the potential we’ll see the equivalent of almost three years’ volume in one hit is already remote.
On the other hand, there’s potential at least a couple of CX-9s might come this way and the idea of a five-star make-over for the budget-minded, city-suited Mazda2 is also looking pretty agreeable to some.
Regardless of the form they take, the Anniversary models will universally make positive environmental impact. For every sale, Mazda New Zealand has pledged to purchase 50 trees from the Trees That Count programme to plant in the “Mazda Native Forest”.
Hold on a minute … isn’t that a …? Yup, sure is. the mighty Mazda Road Pacer.
IN 1930 Mazda produced 30 250cc 4-stroke motorbikes - and the prototype won the first race it entered.
In 1965, it built a futuristic 26 seat ‘glasshouse’ public bus that was unlike its rivals.
More recently, it created a suitcase car. Yes, really. Luggage that could be driven.
In the year that Mazda marks its 100th anniversary and celebrates the people, products and achievements of the last century, today’s contribution from the brand’s public relations department offers insight into some of the most unexpected, unusual and little-known vehicles produced by Hiroshima.
From curious concepts and long-forgotten prototypes to vehicles that actually made production yet were destined to become rarities, this is an odd bunch whose contribution to Mazda’s history reflects engineering ingenuity and a convention-defying spirit.
The courage to question common practices and forge new paths in engineering and design that others considered unfeasible has driven the team at Mazda since 1920.
Along the way Mazda was the first Japanese brand to win the Le Mans 24 Hour race, commercially launched the rotary engine in the iconic Cosmo Sport 110S, created the world’s best-selling two seat roadster - the Mazda MX-5 - and with Skyactiv-X introduced the world’s first production compression ignition petrol engine.
Yet away from these famous significant moments and the countless coupes, sedans, sports cars, family cars, commercial vehicles and roadsters Mazda has become famous for, there’s a hidden story of the projects forgotten by time, so we dig even deeper into the history file to unearth the Mazdas you’ve never heard of. The first of which is the Mazda motorbike, which for a company that today is famed for creating a range of attractively styled and great to drive SUVs and cars, is a real surprise.
Having started life as a cork products manufacturing company in 1920 before progressing to engineering when industrialist Jujiro Matsuda took charge of Toyo Cork Kogyo Co Ltd in 1921 and transformed the business first into a machine tool producer.
The progression from here to cars via three-wheeled trikes like the 1931 Mazda Go is relatively well known, but the fact that before this Mazda produced a prototype motorcycle is a little-known paragraph in the Mazda history book.
Motorcycle racing was popular in Japan in the late 20s with most of the bikes imported or assembled in Japan from imported parts. Toyo Kogyo, as Mazda was then known, wanted to build a domestic Japanese bike and began development of a prototype in 1929. A 250cc 2-stroke prototype motorbike was revealed in October, 1930, and to everyone’s surprise it won its first race beating a British-made Ariel, which were one of the most-popular bike brands in the 30s’ and well-respected in Japan.
Toyo Kogyo went on to produce 30 more motorcycles in 1930, but commercially Matsuda took the decision to instead focus attention on developing the practical Mazda Go three-wheeler, setting the company on the road to success in automobiles rather than motorbikes, and leaving Mazda’s flirtation with motorbikes as a small snippet in the 100-year story of Mazda.
Mazda’s first car also never made it beyond the gestation period either, in 1940 Mazda built a small two-door prototype car called the PKW prototype (below), but the unset of World War II meant it never reached production and Mazda’s post-war reconstruction focused on the production of the Type GA and Type GB three-wheeled Mazda Go inspired three wheeled trucks and their ever bigger and more sophisticated successors.
However, amongst these successful and popular three-wheeled trike trucks Mazda also produced another one of its little-known four-wheeled pioneers – the Type-CA one-ton four-wheeled truck, which was a small open sided canvas roofed, split-screen open-decked truck that bore some resemblance to a Willys Jeep. It predated Mazda’s first production car the R360 Coupe by ten years and wasn’t as famous as Mazda’s three-wheeled trucks.
While the 1960 Mazda R360 was Mazda’s first car and started a lineage that leads all the way to today’s range, Mazda’s history includes commercial vans, pick-ups and light trucks. But while the smaller mini-bus vehicles based on the different generations of Mazda Bongo are relatively well-known, other bus models fall into the ‘Mazdas you’ve never heard of category’.
Mazda sold its first bus in 1960, it was a 13-seater (below) based on the D1500 cab-over compact truck and was sold to the Japanese Defence Agency. The interior was flexible enough that with the seats folded it was designed to transport injured soldiers on stretchers, and the D1500 bus was exported to the Middle East with centre-opening freestyle doors at the back that enhanced its usability as an ambulance.
Mazda’s first bus for general public use was the 1965 25-seater Mazda Light Bus Type-A. Based on a concept shown at the 1964 Tokyo Motor Show, with its huge curved laminated safety glass windscreen and futuristic styling it was a world away from the traditional buses found in Europe in the 60s. Into the 1970s Mazda continued to produce upscale mini-buses using the Parkway model name and in 1974 even introduced the world’s first rotary engine powered bus: the Parkway 26.
Incredibly, as futuristic as the 1965 Light Bus looked and as unique as the 1974 rotary Parkway bus was, both looked positively conventional compared to the 1974 Mazda CVS Personal Car Concept. Mazda’s look into transportation possibilities outside the realm of driver-controlled vehicles, CVS stood for computer-controlled vehicle system, and the CVS was a wheel at each corner box with sliding doors and a spacious interior designed for passenger comfort, including big leather chairs and a telephone.
However, forward-looking computer-controlled transport pods weren’t the only 70s oddities that fall into the Mazdas you’ve never heard of category
Created to meet Mazda’s desire to have a large executive car to be used by Japanese government officials, the little-known Mazda Road Pacer AP was launched in 1975. It used Holden HJ bodies, which were shipped to Japan without engines, whereupon Mazda fitted the 135ps 13B rotary engine.
Designed to take on the grandly named Toyota Century, Nissan President and Isuzu Statesman De Ville, the Road Pacer AP featured luxuries such as speed related central locking and even an inbuilt dictation machine. Only sold in Japan, just 800 were produced between 1975 and 1977.
Another global anomaly in Mazda’s history is the Mazda Pathfinder (above), a traditional 4X4 exclusively assembled and sold in Burma it was a rugged off-roader popular with the military and police. Powered by a 90ps engine it was offered with either a canvas roof or as enclosed nine-seat version, largely unknown in the rest of the world, a few can still be seen on the roads of Myanmar today.
Even stranger than the Burmese built off-roader, futuristic bus or the Australian based limousine is the 1991 Mazda Suitcase Car. The development of a functioning car built into a piece of luggage came about thanks to the 1991 ‘Fantasy yard’ event - an inter-departmental contest to see which group of Mazda employees could come up with the most innovative and creative solution to produce a moving machine.
A select group of seven engineers from Mazda’s manual transmission testing and research group purchased the largest Samsonite suitcase they could find and a quarter size pocket motorbike and set to work on their idea. The 33.6cc two-stroke engine, handlebars from the minibike were fitted into the suitcase, with the rear wheels slotted onto the outside of the case, while the front wheel would pop through a removable hatch in the front. The suitcase car took just minutes to assemble and had a top speed of 30kmh, while the original prototype was accidentally destroyed just a few months after the ‘Fantasy Yard’ event, one Mazda suitcase car still remains in existence.
The same sense of freedom of thinking for engineers and designers that led to a collaboration with the London Royal College of Art in 1993 to sponsor their design project to design to come up with a taxi concept for a future (above) where space would restrict vehicle size. While not an official Mazda concept, Mazda assisted by building the prototype, which was a futuristic looking narrow-track pod shaped mini-car, that was 20 years ahead of its time.
Many of these oddities are a distant memory nowadays, but alongside the more famous models, competition success and records they form part of the history of Mazda - an independent car brand that has always pushed the boundaries of design and engineering to create award-winning vehicles and unique products.
Today, Mazda continues to defy convention to make things better, and as the firm enters its second century, the ingenuity and passion for automotive excellence that has flowed through the Mazda company for its first 100 years is still at the heart of everything the company does.
MotoringNZ reviews new cars and keeps readers up-to-date with the latest developments on the auto industry. All the major brands are represented. The site is owned and edited by New Zealand motoring journalist Richard Bosselman.